The New Model – Spike, Crush, Lead

September 3, 2015
krauserpua

Prepare yourself for some rambling.

This year has been all about experimentation. I’d grown tired of the Daygame Overkill model because though it had brought me great success shifting to that style (indeed, it is now the core LDM style as witnessed by all the shameless YouTube rip-offs) I was getting bored. I was doing the same thing over and over again. I get bored easily. I knew there’d be another step forwards, I just didn’t know what it was. In such cases I follow my subconcious and let the logical forebrain figure out the details later. My subconscious was telling me this:

  • Shorter trips abroad
  • Pull much faster
  • Sexualise stronger
  • Abandon the model

So when the Euro season rolled around in mid-March 2015 that’s what I did. It’s been a slapdash affair with epic highs and incompetent lows. For the first time ever I’ve had more near-misses than lays (about 2:1 ratio). I’ve pushed my 2015 average age of girl down to 21, the quality has crept up very slightly, and my average meet-to-sex time is two hours.

High risk, high reward.

Pull the trigger

Pull the trigger

I’m not satisfied to simply shift my risk/reward meter further along. I want to get better. I want to bring the uncontrollable under my control. So I’ve kept plugging away, stoically absorbing the near-miss pain, and continued to look for patterns. It’s still all a bit foggy but I think the new model is taking shape. It’s a long way off, but I’m starting to grasp it. Here are some of my early thoughts on the differences.

1. Checklist vs Model
Daygame Mastery is written as a detailed linear model of “first do this, then do that”. It works. That’s what everyone is doing and it’s a proven method. The problem is it puts the focus on YOU and what YOU’RE doing. Now I’m all about HER and what she’s READY FOR. It’s a subtle but powerful mental shift, analagous to a boxer throwing the punch for the space that’s opening up rather than the combo he’s practiced on the bag. The real skill comes in setting the girl up for that move, so you’re not merely passively awaiting opportunities. So now I’m drawing as well as leading. This means my mind is on ticking off her indicators so I know the time to move it forwards. If I tick them off in five minutes, I’ll pull the trigger in five minutes. Other times it takes three dates.

2. Key Performance Indicators
I’m not really thinking in terms of attraction / comfort / seduction. Instead I’m provoking and then filtering based on three KPIs that let me know if she’s a strong lead for adventure sex:

  • Electric eye flash some time during first five minutes
  • Acceptance of close distance
  • Strong reply to first SMS

That’s all I need to know if it’s a good probability of fast sex.

eyes

3. DNA filtering
Every advanced daygamer has a finely-tuned spider sense. It crackles at key moments and lets you pick out a girl on a crowded street from 50m away. It sends a thrill through your body during the street stop. It screams “pull the trigger now!” I think key signs are:

  • Ovulating walk
  • Subtle pre-approach IOIs
  • Fast eye sparkle
  • Giddiness and sway
  • Unsolicited touch

These are the ultimate Yes Girls, where your respective DNA codes have pinged each other and agreed to have sex before your forebrains got the memo. You can train yourself to unburden your DNA to let it roam, hunting down your best sets.

Pull the trigger!

Pull the trigger!

4. Forebrain Eviction / Forebrain Panic Room
Assuming the girl has gotten through stages 1-3 and is on the idate / day2 I’ll often experience the peculiar situation where she is extremely giddy and says things like “I don’t know why I’m following you home” or “My brain has stopped working”. It means her hindbrain has so overwhelmingly decided to fuck that it’s impeached her forebrain from control of her actions. The early stages of this I often call “brain fry”.

You’ll spot it mostly from her giddy self-disbelieving “I can’t believe I’m doing this but I can’t stop” manner and it’s most often triggered by a strong first kiss and light neck biting / hair pulling. It’s especially powerful when coupled with the momentum of a sexualised idate. The problem is it often triggers the Panic Room, where her forebrain makes one last-gasp attempt to avoid being fucked. When those shutters slam down there is NO way to bust LMR and often the girl is gone forever.

Brain fry

Brain fry

5. Anal
I’ve taken many anal virginities in the past twelve months and I think it comes down to congruency. When you hit a girl with Diggler-esque r-selection she abandons the Nice Girl track. Assuming you get as far as the lay, anal is just a tiny step further. You don’t even have to ask. Just stick it in.

My personality is INTJ and that means ideas usually simmer in a morass of inpenetrable slop before suddenly appearing as fully-formed theories in a moment of gestalt understanding. I’m not there yet, but I feel it coming on. Of course all of the above assumes you’ve actually mastered the current version of the London Daygame Model.

7 Comments

  1. “The problem is it often triggers the Panic Room, where her forebrain makes one last-gasp attempt to avoid being fucked.”

    She: This is so unlike me. (or any similar statement indicating panic)

    Me [lasering]: We connected deeply because you are tantalized by my exotic flavor and me by yours.” [look away impatiently] “But if you’re not into me no sense wasting my time.”

  2. “My brain has stopped working” I just got this text from a girl I met, had great rapport with, tried to build comfort and kino but who in the end wouldn’t come over. She’s up for meeting next time. I’ve had a few of these situations and I totally get what you mean by checking to see if SHE responds. I’ve had 2 dates with another girl…she shows up, texts, always available but so far hasn’t given me clear IOI’s like the ones you describe. I generally give it 3 meet ups. If it goes no where for whatever reason, I bail and next.

  3. Reblogged this on MGTOW 2.0.

  4. This is definitely more advanced and is based on calibration that takes time to get a sense for. My open to lay count was on my record low recently having only opened 3 girls after a long bout of no approaching. It may have been pure luck and meeting a Yes girl. I’ll have to open more sets to confirm it.

    I +1d an 18 yr old Vietnamese girl with a Jennifer Lopez ass who I met on a Saturday and fucked a few days later. Due to poor logistics, I took a risk and booked a room not knowing if she’ll accept it or not. But I took it due to a) Give me the practice to lead and make things happen, b) Develop a better understanding of the forebrain/hindbrain conflict and c) Due to the signs that she was coming all the way from Kent at 9pm on an evening for drinks with no curfew. I could not have seen the signs a few years ago. So I suppose the biggest takeaway of advanced game is calibration as it’s certainly what’s personally improved my game.

    My biggest problem right now when it comes to r-selection is keeping the girl around after I’ve fucked them. They can often sense my player vibe. How many of the girls you fuck actually sticks around and do you have any tips on how to increase the probability?

  5. This just sounds like the advanced calibration you get from doing so much R-Selection, Daygame Mastery, game. Same game just faster or slower depending on the girl but that has been my problem recently. Missing the signals, when I’m rusty, and going to fast or too slow.

  6. All you really say in this post:

    1) Screen Yes girls. (Various IOIs/compliance)
    2) I don’t yet know how to avoid frying her circuits.

    I suggest more love bubble/intimate touch/specificity throughout. Modern “Jabba” comfort. You finally do his game anyway:P [If Jabba game works for you, do it. K.]

    • The sentence implying people need to first read Mastery and learn old stuff and then do it the simple way…well…you know the truth. I have all your stuff. I know the truth. They don’t need it. If you’re honest you pull old stuff from the market and sell something new, benefitial to the readers. You lost part of the credibility defending friend’s fake infield. Don’t lose all credibility. [You’ve got a hard-on for Jabba. That’s fine, but stop with the concern trolling and trying to bait me into dissing him. K.]

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: