Best Daygame Theory – The Overkill Discussion part 1

March 15, 2015

I’ve spent the past week in Prague whiling away my time in a pleasant manner. I spent a couple of days servicing my rotation, then Tom Torero rolled up with a cameraman and we spent two days filming infields. A couple of near misses with local ladies ensued and by the time rain and cold sapped all the fun out of the streets, I’d also hung out with a US guy who’d learned the ropes in stateside and was now on an extended Euro-Jaunt.

Phew! A busy week!

While rambling on to this US guy about daygame I was once again reminded how deep the skillset is. Imagine sitting Gary Kasparov in a bohemian Prague cafe for a few hours and encouraging him to discuss chess – the gambits, the meta-theory, it’s relationship to real life (he actually wrote a book on that topic), and the way personality expresses itself in your game. I think those few hours would quickly spill over into days.

Now, Kasparov is rather better at his chosen skillset than I am at mine but the point is that daygame is deep. I’m sure nightgame is too, but I don’t know so much about it.

You look very.... oh, fuck it. Coffee break!

You look very…. oh, fuck it. Coffee break!

A fortnight ago I solicited a few intermediate daygamers to watch my instructional program / theoretical exposition Daygame Overkill and to use it as a launchpad to relate their own theoretical insight. My instructions were quite broad, words to the effect of – “Here’s a free login. Watch it, relate it to your own infield experience, and pick up some themes to explore. Don’t worry about being positive – in fact, try to make some real criticisms to encourage debate.”

Over the next week or so I will be posting three different daygamer’s thoughts on Overkill. I hope this will stimulate some discussion and I strongly suggest my readers chip in with their own thoughts in the comments (which I’ll respond to). Some of the themes we’ll hit include:

  • Fine tuning your style to fit women’s dual mating strategy
  • Differences between relying on verbal and non-verbal communication
  • Choosing your targets wisely
  • How my personality reflects itself in set, and how yours reflects itself differently to mine

So without further ado, here is the first essay from Tom Juan – A UK-based guy who has been enthusiastically hitting the streets for a year now…….

I managed to watch all 335 minutes of Daygame Overkill within the space of two days (let’s just say I had a flexible two days, and even found the time after one of my now pissed off never to visit again f-buddies left my flat just last night!) and so the timing of this arriving on to my virtual desk was perfect, needless to say… And with one or two other slack, “take it or leave it” f-buddies on my rotation, I watched Daygame Overkill with much anticipation and with much hunger.

The key question: Has this hunger to learn something I’ve never seen expressed in such a “simplified” manner been sated? All will be revealed…

But I PROMISE I have absolutely tried and tried to cut this review down to a bare minimum, which isn’t easy considering I had 3,000 words of notes to work from (I’m a fast typer since I used to be a Direct Response Copywriter)… And notes that require expansion as the theme Krauser raises in a mostly eloquent manner (beside the occasional ball-scratching and pint-swigging), is simply fascinating. This theme centres around a level of masculinity that us as men in the 15% of Western societies where we are overall exclusively monogamous, have forgotten. Or never dared to even explore fully… And in my one year of feeling lost and confused because I simply can’t and don’t want to settle down (been there, done that), with this product, my justification to be a man is concreted more fully.

The Introduction

Upon starting to watch this, I was impressed by the film-worthy motion graphic titles, introduction clips and feature film clip, even though this was a little “over-egged.” Then on to the introductory Welcome video before the main event… How does a noisy bar presentation fit it into these slick motion graphics??? This seemed completely juxtaposed to the incredible film-like introductions.

That aside, since I’m sure there are downsides we can accept considering Krauser isn’t your “bells and whistles” kind of chap, this product seems to potentially go hand-in-hand with his book or virtual book (can you call it an ebook?), Daygame Mastery, which he later explains is a reference book, not a tips and strategy guide. And that Daygame Overkill is a simplified version of this book, so if you need the theory (nope – just download directly into my brain by watching what you do please), then to refer to the book to delve deep into the who, how, what, why etc.

So is his book Daygame Mastery needed to work alongside Daygame Overkill?

I think the overall suggestion is no, but it depends on whether your the kind of guy who needs to have it laid out in complicated jargon, or if like me, you “get this stuff” on a deep level just by seeing it explained on a simplified level to camera– but again, we all have different learning abilities so although he didn’t say this, it might be a good idea to read it if just watching clips and following his reviews of the infield footage isn’t enough of an explanation.

The most groundbreaking thing about this intro video and product in general, in a nutshell, is the “K” selection vs. “R” selection concept, one which in my acute awareness as a learned daygamer (aware of who else is out there), has never been explained and triggered on a deep down “AHA!” moment in me before. And this is the most eye opening thing about the product because it makes you feel okay about wanting to fuck a lot of women… to put it bluntly.

In a nutshell, Krauser is bringing up the comparison between the nice guy boyfriend daygamer to the lover, sex-based daygamer i.e. R-selected.

Lover / Provider discussion in the Welcome introduction

Lover / Provider discussion in the Welcome introduction

The only other time I’ve seen this explained is in one of Tom Torero’s videos where he delved into the lover vs. provider model, but he just said everything overlapped and there was no black and white, whereas Krauser is the living, breathing example of the black yet still being “kind of normal” at the same time, unlike the R-selection comparable RSD hyper-dudes who don’t ever seem to come down from PUA night game-centric, American (mostly) yes girl fucking heaven… Still valid, but not so relatable.

What Krauser is good for, is being relatable as someone you could meet in a pub and have a beer with, even if he filmed his infields with a hangover…. wtf??? And has a pint in hand in the venue of his talk while going through the Q and A section…

Okay for Beginners?

So it begs the question… is this product any good for beginners??? Or does someone need to be out on the streets getting flaky numbers after being that “nice guy” first before realising that this is the holy grail for him, to stop those boring first dates where you don’t even try and kiss her (wtf?) and get either friend zoned or boyfriend zoned (I don’t know which is worse)… Personally I’d say the latter, as a complete newbie probably won’t get the entirety of this. Unless, he has the sex drive of a tiger on heat, and just wants to take a bit of a short cut that might cut out the pain, yet not allow the excitement of knowing how to overcome the obstacles a newbie nice guy daygamer has… and even knowing this stuff, it will take time becoming socially calibrated enough to get away with a lot of the stuff Krauser is showing.

Even I will have to have my results damaged by changing my ways since I will be trying a new method and although my long term success will be better (including SDL’s or first date fucks which I’ve had only one so far), I might find it less congruent in the beginning and therefore this will affect my results. And for a newbie there is still that initial “wtf do I say to a hot girl?”, let alone “how do I do what Krauser does?” bumps to get over…

So as an ideal goal to hit, it’s great for anyone. But for someone to go out and practice this stuff, it really is an intermediate product.

What if you want a girlfriend? And has he done any market research?

Krauser assumes that having a girlfriend is a bad thing – yes I personally 100% agree but what if there are guys out there who would be happy settling for a hotter, tighter and younger gal to fuck every night and get a pad with, and who knows, have kids with (let’s just say I was one of those guys since I’m a father to two beautiful boys), until of course they get married, they both get bored and they probably get a divorce (got the t-shirt). But aside from that, some relationships work, so what if there are guys genuinely gunning for monogamy?

Therefore I think he should explain that even if you want a girlfriend, it’s still better to be that r-selection boyfriend who is the prize, rather than the nice guy daygamer K-selection boyfriend. Put simply, you can “choose” with this approach, rather than “settle.” Krauser also takes the general stance that most men are K-selected daygamers, rather than r-selected. How does he know this as gospel? Personally I think that a lot of daygamers mix the two, and get it right when they throw in a larger percentage of r-selected, which I have done with the girls I’ve closed way more quickly in the past.

So instead of classifying most men as “K” selected, he should take more of a subjective perspective and see it as fluid ie. most guys will be K-selected in 80% of their sets, but the ones where they are r-selected (20%) will be the ones that net them the quick results i.e. not having to go on 3 dates or more before you get to fuck her. And it’s this fluidity that is missing in his explanation, so instead of being black and white, he should see it as it is – a mixture of the two, and suggest that to improve results and get more success, up the r-selection vibe and diminish the K-selection vibe. Maybe it’s because he doesn’t coach and sees the world through his own eyes (fair enough), but a wider perspective here would have been better in my view.

It’s true as Krauser suggests that most guys are non-sexually-threatening and therefore it doesn’t lead to sex, just nice conversations and numbers, because the women are still getting validation and attention, although she will never text you back, but it’s simply within us naturally as men to be r-selected as well so we can’t help but play on that when we are at our best. Therefore it’s simply about being aware of how to bring our r-selected best version of ourselves, rather than learning something that is acquired like school children – my point being, that the r-selection traits are already within us! It’s just about learning how to draw them out… (try not masturbating for as step one!).

Breaking the model down in the Welcome video

Breaking the model down in the Welcome video

So let’s get to the juicy part – the talk and the infields!

Krauser explains that the infields consist of 10 girls in Zagreb, Croatia within the space of 3 days, October 2014 and within a 1 mile square radius of each other. The first question in combination with alarm bells that hit my brain was – why only over 3 days? Why not commit a week to get the cream of the crop absolute best out of this guy and WITHOUT hangovers… (wtf???) Regardless, he ramps up the theory and makes it really clear about being “social savvy,” “secret society” (I fuck hot girls all the time and I know that you know that I know that you know that) and the powerful sub communicator, rather than “wanna fuck!??” approach and style.

He also brings up his average stats as around 1-in-30, which is twice as good as mine so at least I know I’m watching the right guy to help me improve my results two fold… (everything is crossed). In part 2 of the talk, Krauser points out that everything you do should point to the r-selection. You want her to think you’re the bad boy or asshole… because that box is where all the action happens, even if she’s taken since she knows you won’t give up the game when she fucks you on the side etc – ie. you won’t care about her boyfriend and try and steal her away.

He also talks about risk taking, “birdsong,” that mixing up r and K will really hurt your results, the importance of being the guy who can handle being anonymous, covert sexualisation and how he mixes this in with fractionation. And finally, the cold, hard, fact, that if you go down this path, you are a service provider in “adventure sex.”

Nuff’ said…

Then the talk comes to a penultimate moment where you are about to see evidence of Krauser’s recent lays…. then, Nooooo! Why can’t we see proof of these “younger hotter tighter” girls!?? I’m totally deflated by that… on advice of his mum? (as written in text on the video to cover up these obviously explicit images)… Yet this then raises the question… Shouldn’t his “mum” be telling him not to do any of this full stop? Instead of “just” the part where he proves the type of girl he’s laid for the past year? – and a part which you would have thought would solidify Krauser’s reputation even more firmly, rather than piss you off and make you want to think he’s not so great because of the simple frustration at being denied these, and because you want to be inspired by these pictures so you are driven to succeed with the “younger, hotter, tighter” types yourself…

That’s at least how I felt at this point. So I urge Krauser to include these even if it’s a special VIP bonus that you have to pass some kind of test to access.

Part 3 of his talk expands more about vibe and goes on to explain the 4 pillars of daygame alongside more of an elaboration on covert sexualisation, plus an analogy between poker and daygame – “lose small but win big!” And finally, the importance of compliance tests – I can’t wait to start putting this one into practice! (Again, something I’ve done without realising but never consciously knowing – this will allow for escalation). The Q and A section is where Krauser has a pint in his hand and he starts scratching his balls occasionally… classy! Seriously, leave it alone! And he provides a continued explanation of “vibe”, integral to success in daygame (you can’t be a miserable bastard and succeed).

Infield Overview, in Brief…!

It’s clear that these infields were filmed by his mate Bojangles and were not of a professional quality, not that this is always an obstacle but you want to get the best for what you pay for right? The content however is the most important thing but it seems this was an unplanned affair which turned into a product – sometimes the best way to go, but it would have been nice to know that a little more care and planning (especially as three of the infield analysis’ were filmed from the same pub he filmed the introduction from – just a little budget I’m afraid) had gone into this product you are paying good money for…

With the ten infields, I’ll be honest… I was impressed by six of them, and two of them I thought were at the level of MPUA. Four (maybe three because it’s good to show him ploughing with an out-and-out “no” girl) of them simply shouldn’t have been included, for various reasons. I could go deep into each one and pick it apart bit by bit, but it would make this review double the length, and it would also kill the mystery. However his analysis of himself is great – concise, to the point and elaborates on areas where it’s important to do so.

You also see Krauser calibrate differently to different women and environments. The two where he had results were obvious as to why he got those results, and one in particular would have eaten any novice daygamer alive! Yet she seemed to get a taste of him within a few days of the interaction… He only goes into minute detail where he has diagrams ready within the video on one of the sets, and with the other one that I was blown away by, you can’t see her face which is a real shame, but with the way she was talking, she must have been a 9 or a 10. This makes me think – why didn’t Krauser have a pocket camera as well as the “from a distance” camera perspective?

Underground seduction, yesterday

Underground seduction, yesterday

There are certain things Krauser does that you would never notice unless they were explained, especially in the nuances and sub-communication, and for the sets I was impressed by, I would watch those again once or twice just to ensure I’ve fully soaked up what I need to learn to allow me to progress to the next level by implementing the same. As mentioned earlier, why not hit the streets for at least 1 or 2 weeks, not necessarily going out every day but having a good range of infields to choose from instead of having to include four sets that in my opinion shouldn’t have been included.

He is showing us the kind of “no” or “maybe” girl in one of these, but I actually think he could have done better in three of them (one was just your typical “no” girl), for example not getting the hook point before suggesting a coffee/date/number? Come on Krauser… And not seeming to have built rapport on three of them enough for them to be a solid fuck close, as he does date two of the four but it doesn’t really go further other than a make out.

I’m being super critical because of Krausers reputation and obvious results in the past few years, which obviously I wouldn’t apply to just anyone, but if further explanation is required I would be happy to provide it.


My conclusion is that this product is definitely worth buying especially if like me you are intermediate and so far work hard for the number and then have to work hard for the eventual sex… And because this is groundbreaking in that no one else has so far had the balls to elevate this r-selection theme to this level before, in a way that is relatable, it’s probably the only product out there that will cover both the theory and the practical with conciseness and a few laughs (admittedly Krauser is funny), so I would buy it just on that basis.

The in-fields could have been better – two are bloody amazing and four are really good, but four of them disappointed me… So if those four were replaced with good, solid sets where the results speak for themselves, he could make something already ground breaking “even more” groundbreaking.

The six that were awesome-to-good are worth watching more than once so that you really get the nuances, that won’t ever be explained in a YouTube video and leave you even more clueless as to when you started, so you are basically paying for his own analysis which certainly has value.

The one question remains…. What does Krauser do on a date to secure the sex? Maybe a sequel that covers this is soon on its way to your inbox…. Watch this space

Tom J

Thanks Tom. I hope this stimulates some debate in the comments. Daygame Overkill is on sale and available here. Further discussion pieces inbound soon. You can read more about Tom and watch his infield videos at


  1. It’s really interesting how r/K-selection is expressed by Krauser, Tom Torero and Steve Jabba.


    Nick Krauser: skull rings, bracelets, boots, leather jacket. 100% r-selected.

    Tom Torero: Krauser style, minus some bad boy accessories, also a bit less masculine body shape. This, however, makes big difference in impression and is in line with the character of Nice Bad Boy Tom promotes. It’s not clear whether he’s wolf in sheep’s clothing or panda in leather jacket.

    Steve Jabba: The style is comparable to Tom Torero, more attention to fitting clothes, e.g showing the body underneath. sometimes more K-selected clothing – polo shirts etc, but this only softens the already strong r-selected impression from body and dominance.


    Nick Krauser: Drilled model considering all eventualities, universal fractionation, precision, cold blooded execution. More of a threat.

    Tom Torero: Little less structured, less threatening, cheekier, otherwise similar. Stronger in bamboozling.

    Steve Jabba: Full reliance on subcommunication, nearly total abandonment of routines and linear underlying progression, the most direct verbally and in body language. Sexual tension mixed with tenderness. Love Bubble. Bending the rules.

    Now, I feel in some areas Steve is far ahead. Where Nick and Tom use flexible routines, Steve achieves the target on a different level. For example, even though Tom and Nick already abandoned the linear division of Attraction, Comfort, Seduction, it’s still kind of there, even though it’s fractionated through the model. Still, even the most powerful technique is weaker than creating the Love Bubble. The date model in Mastery is very precise, while Steve’s dating advice is very simple and spontaneous in comparison. I feel this freedom allows for stronger, real connection to occur, and is less damaging long term, because you don’t have to “run the questions game” etc. You are you, even though you also had to learn this to get there. But, all this relies on your personality. Nick probably won’t ever be able to run Steve’s game. Tom could, I think. But the simpler the system, the more value – body, style, entitlement etc. – needs to be there to begin with. So it’s not easier overall, just different.

    The article states “Mixing up r and K will really hurt your results.”
    So, what is this combination of hard approach and love bubble in case of Steve Jabba, or Nice Bad Boy in case of Tom Torero, if not a masterful combination of r and K? Of course it’s not 50/50, more like 80/20, but it’s there. The way I see it, there is a spectrum of r and K characteristics and you keep the desirable ones from both, r desirable pool is simply larger.

  2. I really think it only comes down to your personal vibe(biggest piece), looking normal ( not like jabba the hut ), and having zero approach anxiety. If you have all those three, you could just play the numbers game and say “Hey I saw you over there and thought you look quit nice …” followed by average guy questions game… and get laid plenty. Maybe 1 or 2 solid lays every hundred sets. The skill would come down to knowing the best cities, target selection ( to lower that 1-2/100 to 1-2/50 ), and living a lifestyle that keeps your vibe high and allows you enough free time to game ( pretty much have no job aka Krauser/Bodi/Tom/Roosh etc etc )

    I think the biggest thing in game that is hardly discussed is your own vibe. She feels what you feel. Tom and Yad are not good looking dudes, just average or maybe even slightly below, yet you can tell just by watching videos of them they are happy dudes with a good energy. Reading Krausers bio the thing I took away from it is that in his early days of game he was “angry”. It fucked his game ALL up. Once he quit work for a while and got his vibe up to “happy cool dude” levels the lays started coming in like a flood. I follow Krausers friend Bodi’s blog. Dude struggles not because his game sucks or he knows nothing, it’s his vibe. You can read between the lines of almost every blog post Bodi makes (esp on his old blog) and tell this dudes vibe is awful. You could probably rename his blog to The Quest For Vibe. I’m sure if I gave him some coke or other drug that artificially skyrockets your vibe to rockstar levels he would get laid 1 out of 20-30 approaches in the right cities.

    This is a bit of a ramble but hopfiully somebody understands what I’m getting at or K comments. [Vibe is important but hugely overrated by all the “natural game” types to cover for that fact they are weak technicians. It’s like a striker having a good eye for goal without knowing anything about positioning, balance, and kicking the ball cleanly – it’s great but not enough to perform anywhere near his potential. K]

    • That was quite interesting.

    • Agree, vibe is the biggest bottle neck that holds people back. I would go further and say its inner game. While vibe is the energy in that particular moment, inner game describes how well or how often you can create a great vibe. Its something that is hard to teach, however there is good material from tony robbins on the topic of emotional control and making your mind you friend, not your enemy.

    • If you get blown out 6 times on the trot, its hard to “keep up” vibe. Maybe just make sure you don’t get blown out!

  3. What I don’t get is the black and white thinking regarding a “girlfriend” or “no girlfriend” topic. The way Its portrait is, its either a fuck buddy or a girlfriend. A girlfriend is bad, because then you have to commit to her, so you rather have f-buddies. My question is, why not redefining the term “girlfriend”. They are your girlfriends, but you aren’t committed to them, because its on your terms. I know of course its harder to achieve, but this is what I would define as my ultimate goal. [That’s why the “monogamy” background goes through the r-BF box and doesn’t surround it. K.]

  4. From earlier materials Krauster explained this idea of the lover vs provider archetype, if you position yourself as the lover you can also be provider but if you’re boxed in as the “provider” then the girl tends to know sex is a reward for YOU so she’ll tool you.

    I’m having a variety of relationships right now—all sexual…but in each of these cases the girls just want my attention, they’re not THAT concerned about raising the exclusivity with me for fear of pissing me off.

    They act out in other ways—being jealous, trying to monopolize my time, buying me gifts etc….

    How do you start this? You have to incept it early….framing girls as “sex maniacs’ or “crazy” or “Wild”….and you as the kind of lion tamer puts you in a position where you are the lover and they are there for you.

    I think there are more tactical answers, but this is my view top-line.

  5. Great post K,
    Absolutely gutted I missed you as I just landed in Prague yesterday afternoon (15th March) for a one week daygame jaunt with my wing.
    Was hoping to grab a drink and share some thoughts.. Another time sure.. [You’ll be double-gutted when you find out when I return to Prague, sorry boss! K.]

  6. For me, i’m struggling to get my head around whether it’s possible to be both the r guy and the K guy because there’s a lot of conflicting information out there at the moment that leaves little hope for guys wanting to at least commit to a girl in the future, even though the material out there advises not to based on a female’s dual mating strategy and hypergamy.

    I’ve had a lot of discussions about this with Paul Janka a year ago who is getting married this year with his long-term girlfriend and he states that becoming beta is inevitable and relates his theories on the book ‘Practical Female Psychology for the Practical Man’.

    So it essentially leaves players and gamers in a confusing spot of not knowing where to go once they’ve achieved a certain level in their game. There will ultimately come a point where you’ll desire a union of some kind.

    Understanding the dynamics at play, there are lots of variables and land mines to avoid if we’re to exercise our wants to settle with the type of women we want. For example, the drawbacks and dangers of dating an 8/9 versus dating a 7 and below. Its clear that either way will pose problems. A 6/7 would provide a higher chance of security and loyalty (Assuming you’re maintaining your value) but feeling left unsatisfied knowing you could date hotter girls. An 8+ would be a better fuck, but will require constant game and frame control assuming she’s younger, hotter and tighter

    In addition to marriage laws literally stripping a guy off his balls in favour of women and losing all control and attraction in the relationship.

    The players i’ve seen so far have all seemed to settle with girls who are lesser looking than them. But then where’s the satisfaction?

    I’m curious to know if anyone has any solutions to this dilemma and how guys who end up in relationships actually make it work.

    • I’m not sure whether it’s realistic to expect your 9 will be faithful if your game is good enough. I mean, your spell will work, but there will be times where you are not present and she meets another solid player. Steve Jabba said in his book some girl constantly flirted with other men in his presence. And this was Steve Jabba. I have this visceral feeling of disgust when this happens, even though I like to think I accept women “as they are”. But what can you do? Set boundaries, sure, but she’s hotter than you. Walk away? Yeah, back to square one. I’d like to know whether claiming ownership, great sex and game really make girls 100% faithful. My sample size of 9’s is quite small. Maybe it’s these particular girls. I certainly met some 9’s where I affected them emotionally but they sticked to their boyfriends. [Part of the Jabba thing you mention relates to how girls see him and the types he likes. Crudely put, he likes the “badass bitches” and they want him for a short-term sport fuck. Not always, but that’s the niche he has specialised in which is a double-edged sword. K.]

      • Thanks for your thoughts.

        My ex was an 8 on the looks scale and is still chasing me for sex and commitment despite other guys pining over her and wanting to court her on dates and commitment.
        She even tried making me jealous at some stage by bringing a guy along with her to the same Salsa venue I go to.

        Not giving 2 fucks, I simply wished her well, shook the guys hand and went on my way. Rollo’s right when he wrote the article on ‘Alpha Widows’. She got a taste of alpha from me, even more so by breaking up with her and can’t seem to get it from the other beta chodes who’re giving her attention. Add to the fact that she never got dumped by any of her exes and was the one doing the dumping.

        I know that this dynamic only works because she doesn’t have me by the balls in marriage. On the same token, I don’t think I could ever be happy emotionally by sustaining the indifferent ‘Don’t give a fuck’ attitude in a relationship if I ever pursue one in the future. It seems as though you have to sacrifice being emotionally available in order to keep her attraction and ‘love’ for you going. [I think Deep Conversion works well for a few years, and also that women’s propensity to cheat is really overrated in the manosphere. K.]

    • Onder, I’ve been married 30+ years. Mrs. Gamer was an uncirculated dime when we married. She settled for me when she was 27. Obviously, as a 10, she expected to match an 11 or 12, which only exist in fantasy.

      I use Dread. I go clubbing solo on weekend nights. She stays home. Mateguards herself flawlessly. I have never brought up the subject of mateguarding. One bf before me and he only got closed-lip kisses. I had to teach Mrs. Game how to french kiss. Mrs Gamer still looks good after 30+ years of marriage. When I take Mrs. Gamer out, if I go off and leave her alone, it’s a matter of a few seconds before some other man approaches her.

      She is still chasing me. That’s what you want in a relationship. I still have to use relationship game to manage her emotional chemistry. No avoiding that. Flirt, provide comfort, preemptively create drama, provide validation. Rinse and repeat.

      • Thanks for the advice. Seems pretty solid. I’m curious to know how you’re able to succeed at that under the conditions of a marriage where a woman can easily fuck you over, knowing that she can and get away with it. Doesn’t that element of certainty for her make it harder to maintain control?

      • Our assets are about even. Empty nesters. She needs me to drive at night since she can’t and do yard work. She also is very into me and I give her a good time when we’re together unless she’s hysterical like when she found out that I had dance-bonded to another woman. I should have lied about why I was changing venues, but Monday morning quarterbacking now. It made her even hotter for me, but lots of drama, too.

        Mrs. Gamer had a very good relationship with her father, so that works to benefit our relationship. Think 1970’s tradcon. Reactionary these days. Patriarchal in a chivalrous sense.

        I have her address me as “Sir” whenever I do something courteous for her. I’m her lord, she’s my lady.

        I also have the philosophy, “pussy is just pussy.” Masculine Imperative.

        Hope that clarifies my frame.

  7. Can you have Friends With Benefits who is part of your social circle? I can see problems with that.

  8. I hope the last statement is an accurate prophecy and we get to see a infield date product come out. It would be fantastic to see what Krauser does on dates and in general it would be a revolutionary product in the industry, as no one has done such a thing. [I have a book half-done about this but not sure if I’ll finish it. My dating style is fairly specific to me. K.]

  9. I love when dudes come around claiming they have been married for 90000 years to a SOLID 10 dime super model and through their uber untouchable wizard level game they have kept her interested and faithful. Talking about bullshit like dread game and other equally laughable gambits.

    Now, to anybody who REALLY IS in the game… what this really means is one of three things.

    1. The woman is actually not nearly as hot as Mr Superman Husband claims. Other dudes could give a fuck about her.

    2. The man and woman live in east bumfuck, with a population of 500 and everyone knows everything. Besides the fact no high value men are present… she would be caught and cast out of the community if her vagina got her into trouble.

    3. Mr Superman Husband is clueless, and his wife is actually sucking off Krauser at a dirty pub while he types these comments back at his shitty flat. When he goes out dread game clubbing his wife is messaging men on and arranging to get her ass fucked when he goes to work the next day.

    Why do you think all the REAL gamers, guys with unquestionable proof they are seasoned pros.. have no serious girlfriend or get married? Because they KNOW a hot high value sexy woman cannot be permanently tamed. They know the value they bring to the table is no guarantee for the future. They don’t want to be sitting around worrying about bullshit. They got into the game for freedom. When I see a guy having multiple mini relationships and always keeping a roation… I know he knows the truth about woman. When I see Mr Superman Husband I just see a wanna be who probably got lucky and cashed in ASAP. [Let’s keep it civil. The same point can be made without insults. K.]

    • “Because they KNOW a hot high value sexy woman cannot be permanently tamed.”

      I went out with a 9 years ago. I was able to trust her more than any other girlfriend I’ve had. She got hit on by male models so was validated, it’s the 6’s and 7’s who I mistrusted because they wanted to believe they were above that. But, this is early 20’s girls who haven’t properly formed their SMV. By 28 or so and a few boyfriends, they know where they really stand. Now? I’d be very happy with a 6/7 face and a slimish body ( absolutely cannot be fat), and a great personality. Believe it or not, women want to bond with men too, but, if you suck ( not funny, can’t flirt, are a dull man ) then you will get left, because there is a ton of choice for women, and, they can make their own money, So guys have to have some game now, just showing up with a paycheque isn’t going to cut it anymore.

      • I agree. I personally haven’t been with any 8+ girls and is my main goal this year to up the quality and get the experience in meeting and fucking them. I was told the higher quality girls are less fun in the sack due to not having to make an effort due to their looks. But we’ll have to see.

  10. I read that Krauser is “not the best looking guy”. Watching the first video, he seems he more then makes up for it by being in shape and an excellent good fashion sense. Do you always go dressed well when picking up women? [Yes. I pick my style and optimise it to the best of my ability. K.]

    • I wouldn’t call Krauser an “in-shape” dude, unless he’s made some recent changes. I remember a fuck video he posted about a year ago. He was skinny fat and had a beer gut.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: