There has been much discussion in Chateau RSG on how to rate girls on the 1-10 scale. We aren’t so full of ourselves that we believe girls shouldn’t be rated, as if we have somehow transcended the most basic male impulse of ranking girls. At the end of the day there is far more pleasure to be had from banging a ten than a four. The current system is thus:
<4 – Totally invisible. Utterly unthinkable
5 – You’d fuck her only if there were extreme extenuating circumstances such as violence, drugs, or a solemn obligation to a third party. Or, in Big Toe’s case, a rare flag
6 – You’d do her if it was easy, you’re horny, and you could smuggle her in and out without your friends seeing. You want her out of your house the moment you bust a nut and like eating a Big Mac meal there is a tawdy shame in the whole episode
7 – Neither shame nor glory. A nice girl who is worth some effort. Perhaps you’d take her on occasional dates and if her personality / vibe is sweet and her style your type, you’d even date her over the medium term
8 – You want to parade her around whoever will watch. You feel genuinely good about dating / fucking this girl. When your friends talk about her, they say things like “you should see his bird, she’s well hot”
9 – Simply appearing in public with her makes your heart swell with pride and random guys hate you. You consider dropping your other girls for her and occasionally calculate whether you’ve finally found the right girl to make a serious go with. She’s the realistic pinnacle of Game.
10 – She’s unrealistically hot, the sort of girl you rarely even see. When she walks into a room she’s like a beacon of value. You have no haters because men simply cannot comprehend that you’d be fucking her, so they assume you are a gay best friend. You cannot imagine any girl anywhere in the world being her superior, only an equal.
Ultimately there is no way to rate a woman on raw objective beauty. A cohesive rating system must be based on how she makes you feel and the social response you get for boning her.
September 16, 2011 at 9:01 am
Broadly agree with the fungible comment, though must be careful not to say that in public 🙂
Most girls are boring and have limited personality… I am constantly amazed how on dates or while having conversations with groups of girls in my social circle (all under 25) etc how all the wit, spark and humour is coming out of my mouth, with next to nil contributed from them apart from trite social observations…
When was the last time a girlfriend of yours or girl on a date made you laugh out loud???
September 16, 2011 at 1:08 pm
Hey man do you teach 1-on-1’s or Bootcamps??
September 16, 2011 at 1:37 pm
Good system! Love the way you rated the 6 :))
Still, how do you rate a good looking babe that behaves like a stupid school girl?
She’s a 9 for the looks and a 5 for her personality. Do you make the arithmetic average? 🙂
September 16, 2011 at 11:26 pm
None of his descriptors really refer to personality. It’s all about the arm candy fellas.
September 18, 2011 at 7:07 am
The rating also depends on where you live. A guy who lives in D.C is going to have way lower standards than a guy living in Stockholm or Riga.
A Stockholm 8 would be considered a stunner in D.C, while in Toronto she’d be a 9 to a 9.5.
September 18, 2011 at 10:47 am
Well, all those rankings are pretty much pointless because they base on personal opinions not on general guidelines, i.e one my fancy fatties and other the anorectic types or ‘she had this thing what I like about women so I’ll rate her an 9’.
I find that people use those ranking more for status/bragging games than use it as a helpful part of an report or article beside the fact this might correspond with ‘how hard to get’ the girl was, with highly emphasis on the ‘MIGHT’ aspect of it because not all high status/value girls are ‘hard to get’ they only tend to.
September 19, 2011 at 5:11 pm
Krauser you are contradicting yourself, by your own definition of being alpha, alphas dont care what other men think about their women. Caring what other men think is beta. “What makes them beta is their heart. They still look externally to society to tell them what is cool. They want to follow the trends. They want to fit in. They want society to pat them on the head and say “good boy!” etc
[nit-picking = beta K.]
September 22, 2011 at 4:54 pm
denial = beta
smileys = higher alpha
Pingback: More on rating chicks… | Shade ZERO
January 15, 2012 at 1:11 am
You’re all so superficial!
Women are far more than their looks or “hotness”. Imagine if some random guy rates your daughter as you have just done. You guys need to grow up.
And yes, I am a guy, and I have no daughter.
August 9, 2016 at 2:49 am
Well, you’re obviously a beta male faggot. Most women are shit, not all but most, and they have no use but to please men any way they can. Outside of that, most women, but not all women, are irritating and just… ficking worthless.
June 29, 2014 at 3:35 pm
“the social response you get for boning her”.. as Ayn Rand would have said, that’s second-hander thinking.
June 29, 2014 at 3:43 pm
I could not care less about tits, and if a face is above the bovine then it’s no big deal, but for a beautiful butt I’d walk over broken glass.